Parker
Parker v. Attorney General of the United States
Opinion
Opinion
996 F.2d 1226 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles R. PARKER, Ambassador To The Lord, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE UNITED STATES; Attorney General Of the State of Arizona; William Gumaer; Judge, Kingman Justice Court, County of Mohave; J. Cooper, # 2174, State Agent, in his Corporate Capacity and Martin J. Cooper; Martin Rodgers, County Attorney, County of Mohave; Deputy County Attorney, County of Mohave, Defendants-Appellees. 1 No. 92-17031. 2 United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1993. * Decided June 15, 1993. 3 Before CANBY, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges 4 MEMORANDUM ** 5 Charles R. Parker appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing his claim against Arizona state defendants and granting summary judgment for defendants William Gumaer (Kingman Justice Court Judge) and the deputy county attorney for Mohave county. 1 Apparently, Parker was cited for several traffic violations including…