Jack Ruggles, Jr. v. State of Nevada, Gary Whipple, David Sowder, David Hefner, Janet Garrietty, T.J. Cappaccio, Lou Gregory, Sam McMurray

996 F.2d 1227 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Jack RUGGLES, Jr., et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. STATE OF NEVADA, Gary Whipple, David Sowder, David Hefner, Janet Garrietty, T.J. Cappaccio, Lou Gregory, Sam McMurray, Defendants-Appellants. No. 92-15052. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 15, 1993. Decided July 1, 1993. Before: FERGUSON, CANBY, and BRUNETTI, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 This case presents numerous issues regarding the qualified immunity of state officials sued in their individual capacity by Jack, Jr., and Tamra Ruggles ("the Ruggles") under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . Various officers of the Public Service Commission of Nevada ("PSC officers") appeal the district court's denial of their summary judgment motion predicated on the affirmative defense of qualified immunity. We have jurisdiction over the federal claims in this interlocutory appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . Mitchell v. Forsyth, 472…