Robert L. Theede v. U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs

Good Law
996 F.2d 1227·1993 WL 230277·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 22817
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 199391-15975California543 words

Opinion

Opinion

996 F.2d 1227 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert L. THEEDE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS; et al., Defendant-Appellee. No. 91-15975. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1993. * Decided June 29, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert L. Theede appeals pro se the district court's orders dismissing his action and denying his motion for reconsideration. The district court dismissed Theede's complaint pursuant to an order barring future filings. Theede contends that the district court improperly dismissed his action and that he is entitled to have this action decided on the merits. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we vacate and remand. 1 See De Long v. Hennessey, 912 F.2d 1144, 1149 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 111 S.Ct. 562 (1990); accord Moy v. United States, 906 F.2d 467, 471 (9th Cir.1990). 3 On December 9, 1988, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.