Robert C. Rehfuss v. Northpoint Homeowner's Association
Opinion
Opinion
996 F.2d 1227 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert C. REHFUSS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. NORTHPOINT HOMEOWNER'S ASSOCIATION, Defendant-Appellee. No. 93-15203. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1993. * Decided June 15, 1993. Before CANBY, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert C. Rehfuss appeals pro se the district court's dismissal for lack of subject matter jurisdiction of his action challenging the dues and fees accessed by the Northpointe 1 Homeowner's Association, Inc. (Northpointe). Rehfuss also contests the district court's award of attorney's fees in the amount of $600. Rehfuss and his spouse own a lot in the Northpointe subdivision and he contends that he is not subject to Northpointe's covenants, conditions and restrictions. We review de novo the district court's dismissal, Tanner v. Heise, 879 F.2d 572, 576 (9th Cir.1989). The district court's award of attorney's fees is reviewed for an…