Shelley Reinisch Ronald Reinisch v. United States

996 F.2d 1227 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Shelley REINISCH; Ronald Reinisch, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. UNITED STATES of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-15481. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1993. * Decided June 15, 1993. Before CANBY, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellants, Shelley G. Reinisch and Ronald F. Reinisch ("the Reinischs"), timely appeal from the dismissal of their independent action for relief from prior judgments of the United States District Court for the District of Colorado and the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. The United States District Court for the Northern District of California declined to exercise jurisdiction over the Reinischs' action. We affirm. I. FACTS AND PRIOR PROCEEDINGS 3 This dispute derives from a loan obtained by Solarado, Inc. from the Small Business Administration (SBA). Ronald Reinisch, president of Solarado, and his wife…