Delton Lynn Taylor v. James Rowland, Director, Department of Corrections Charles D. Marshall

Good Law
996 F.2d 1227·1993 WL 219863·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 22805
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 21, 199392-15685California501 words

Opinion

Opinion

996 F.2d 1227 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Delton Lynn TAYLOR, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James ROWLAND, Director, Department of Corrections; Charles D. Marshall, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15685. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1993. * Decided June 21, 1993. Before CANBY, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoner Delton L. Taylor appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of prison officials in Taylor's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action, alleging his civil rights were violated when a prison guard did not loosen Taylor's handcuffs. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo to determine whether, viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, there are any issues of material fact and whether the district court correctly applied the substantive…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.