Valarie Jo Swayne v. Baldemar Salinas

996 F.2d 1227 RICO Bus.Disp.Guide 8352 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Valarie Jo SWAYNE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Baldemar SALINAS; et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16784. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1993. * Decided July 1, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Valarie Jo Swayne appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment in favor of defendants in Swayne's action under the Racketeer Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act ("RICO"), 18 U.S.C. §§ 1961-68 . We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo, Lancaster Community Hosp. v. Antelope Valley Hosp. Dist., 940 F.2d 397 , 399 (9th Cir.1991), cert. denied, 112 S.Ct. 1168 (1992), and affirm. 3 In reviewing the district court's summary judgment, we must determine whether, "[v]iewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the non-moving party, ... there are genuine issues…