Earl W. Roadarmel Kathleen Roadarmel v. Great Western Chemical Company, a Washington Corporation, and Exxon Corporation, a New Jersey Corporation

996 F.2d 1227 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Earl W. ROADARMEL; Kathleen Roadarmel, Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. GREAT WESTERN CHEMICAL COMPANY, a Washington corporation, Defendant-Appellant, and Exxon Corporation, a New Jersey Corporation, Defendant. No. 91-36135. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 10, 1993. * Decided June 23, 1993. Before FARRIS, FERGUSON and D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Great Western Chemical Company ("Great Western") appeals from a jury verdict in favor of Earl and Kathleen Roadarmel in the Roadarmels' products liability action for injuries sustained by Earl Roadarmel due to his exposure to the chemical toluene. The toluene was manufactured in bulk by Exxon and then distributed by Great Western for the use of Acme, Roadarmel's employer, at a road construction site. Great Western argues that there was insufficient evidence to support the verdict, and that the special verdicts are inconsistent and…