Manse Sullivan Dennis Garbutt v. James K. Rowland

996 F.2d 1227 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Manse SULLIVAN; Dennis Garbutt, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. James K. ROWLAND, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16130. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1993. * Decided June 28, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 California state prisoners Manse Sullivan and Dennis Garbutt appeal pro se the district court's judgment following a jury trial in favor of prison officials in Sullivan and Garbutt's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights action alleging that they received inadequate medical treatment, were housed in inadequately lighted and ventilated cells, and were fed inadequately. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and affirm. 3 Manse and Garbutt contend that the district court abused its discretion by failing to appoint counsel for them at trial. This contention lacks merit. 4 Appointment of counsel under section 28 U.S.C. § 1915…