Tibbetts By and Through Tibbetts v. Syntex Corp.

996 F.2d 1227 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Emily TIBBETTS, a minor, By and Through her parent and guardian ad litem; Mary TIBBETTS, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. SYNTEX CORPORATION; Syntex Laboratories, Inc.; Syntex U.S.A., Inc., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-16637. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted April 14, 1993. Decided July 2, 1993. Before: SCHROEDER, PREGERSON, D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM * 2 Emily Tibbetts ("Tibbetts"), by and through her parent and guardian ad litem Mary Tibbetts, brought suit against Syntex Corporation, Syntex Laboratories, Inc., and Syntex U.S.A., Inc. (collectively "Syntex") to recover for injuries received as a result of consuming "Neo-Mull-Soy," an infant formula manufactured by Syntex. Tibbetts appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Syntex. We affirm. I. Expiration of the Statute of Limitations 3 The district court granted summary judgment in favor…