United States v. Ernest L. Davis

996 F.2d 1228 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Ernest L. DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50280. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1993. * Decided June 14, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Ernest L. Davis, a federal prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his coram nobis petition to correct an illegal sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1651 . Davis contends that the ten-year special parole term imposed as part of his sentence was illegal because the district court failed to specify the count to which the special parole term was attached. 1 We review de novo a district court's denial of a petition for coram nobis relief. Hirabayashi v. United States, 828 F.2d 591, 594 (9th Cir.1987). The district court's findings of fact are reviewed for clear error. Id. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 ,…