United States v. Forrest "Junior" Busby, A/K/A Forrest Wiles Busby, Jr.
Opinion
Opinion
996 F.2d 1228 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Forrest "Junior" BUSBY, a/k/a Forrest Wiles Busby, Jr., Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10514. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1993. * Decided July 1, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, AND T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Busby appeals his conviction and sentence for conspiracy to manufacture marijuana, manufacturing marijuana and aiding and abetting the manufacture of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846 and 841(a)(1) and 18 U.S.C. § 2 . We affirm. 3 Busby's court-appointed counsel filed a brief on appellant's behalf pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738 (1967). Under Anders, an appellate defense attorney who concludes, after a conscientious review of the record, that the appeal is wholly without merit must so advise the court and request permission to withdraw. "That request must, however, be…