United States v. Kimberly Ann Boyd

996 F.2d 1228 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kimberly Ann BOYD, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10261. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1993. * Decided July 2, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Kimberly Ann Boyd appeals her jury conviction for possession with intent to distribute and importation of heroin in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 952. Boyd contends that the district court erred by denying her motion to suppress the heroin obtained from her by United States Customs Officers following a border stop. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 Boyd contends that the Customs Inspectors lacked reasonable suspicion to undertake a warrantless search of her person. This contention lacks merit. 4 We review de novo the question of whether a border detention was based on reasonable…