United States v. Florencio Gomez

996 F.2d 1228 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Florencio GOMEZ, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30494. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1993. * Decided July 2, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Florencio Gomez appeals his conviction following a conditional guilty plea to possession and attempt to possess with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Gomez contends that the district court erred by denying his motion to dismiss the indictment for violating his right to a speedy trial under the Sixth Amendment and the Speedy Trial Act, 18 U.S.C. § 3161 (c)(1). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review Speedy Trial Act rulings under two standards; "[f]actual findings are reviewed for 'clear error' and questions involving legal standards are reviewed de novo." United…