I.R.C.

United States v. I.R.C.

Good Law
996 F.2d 1228·1993 WL 212524·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23214
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 17, 199392-50673California625 words

Opinion

Opinion

996 F.2d 1228 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. I.R.C., Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50673. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1993. * Decided June 17, 1993. MEMORANDUM ** Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 I.R.C., a juvenile, appeals his 24-month term of official detention imposed following his admission of juvenile delinquency in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 5032 , in that he transported illegal aliens in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1324 . I.R.C. was resentenced following a limited remand from this court, 1 and contends that the district court erred by not considering the rehabilitative effect of incarceration before resentencing him. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 2 2 On remand for resentencing, the district court is without discretion to reduce a defendant's sentence due to exemplary prison conduct. Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(a);…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.