United States v. George R. Mike McCray

Good Law
996 F.2d 1228·1993 WL 230273·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23234
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 29, 199392-10683California773 words

Opinion

Opinion

996 F.2d 1228 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George R. Mike McCRAY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10683. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1993. * Decided June 29, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 George R. "Mike" McCray appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Crim.P. 33 motion for a new trial. McCray was convicted of conspiracy, attempting to interfere with the administration of internal revenue laws, mailing threatening communications and aiding and abetting, in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2 , 371, 876, and 26 U.S.C. § 7212 (a). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review for abuse of discretion a district court's denial of a motion for a new trial. United States v. McKinney, 952 F.2d 333, 335 (9th Cir.1991). The district court's determination that it lacked…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.