United States v. Larry Hoskie

996 F.2d 1228 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Larry HOSKIE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10327. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 14, 1993. * Decided June 16, 1993. Before: BROWNING, CHOY and CANBY, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 In February 1992, Larry Hoskie was convicted after a jury trial of aggravated sexual abuse in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2241 (c) and abusive sexual contact in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2244 (a)(1). Hoskie was sentenced to 188 months of imprisonment followed by five years of supervised release. Hoskie appeals from the conviction and sentence. 3 Hoskie contends that the district court erred in admitting the testimony of Dr. Herschel Rosenzweig, an expert on sexual child abuse. This issue is controlled by United States v. Hadley, 918 F.2d 848, 852-53 (9th Cir.1990), cert. dismissed, 113 S.Ct. 486 (1992), in which we held that the district court…