United States v. David Richard Clark

996 F.2d 1228 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Richard CLARK, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50409. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1993. * Decided June 18, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; No. CR-91-0965-SVW, Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding. C.D.Cal. AFFIRMED. Before CANBY, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 David Richard Clark appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for two counts of armed bank robbery in violation of 18 U.S.C. §§ 2113 (a), (d). Clark contends that the district court coerced the jury during its deliberations. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 3 "In assessing the coerciveness of a supplemental jury instruction, we look to the form of the jury charge, the period of deliberation following the charge, the total time of…