United States v. Andrias Karapetian

996 F.2d 1228 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Andrias KARAPETIAN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 91-50548. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1993. * Decided July 2, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Andrias Karapetian appeals his conviction following a conditional guilty plea to possession with intent to distribute cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1). Karapetian contends the district court erred by denying his motion to suppress evidence of drugs seized pursuant to a search warrant issued subsequent to a warrantless entry into his residence. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 We review de novo a district court's denial of a motion to suppress evidence. United States v. Homick, 964 F.2d 899, 902 (9th Cir.1992). The district court's determinations of underlying facts controls unless…