United States v. Gena K. McKenzie

Good Law
996 F.2d 1228·1993 WL 170944·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 23210
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 20, 199393-10098California1,379 words

Opinion

Opinion

996 F.2d 1228 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Gena K. MCKENZIE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-10098. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 12, 1993. * Decided May 20, 1993. 1 Before REINHARDT, TROTT and RYMER, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Gena K. McKenzie appeals her sentence imposed after revocation of probation. McKenzie contends that her sentence unlawfully exceeds the maximum allowable for her underlying offense under the Sentencing Guidelines. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 4 McKenzie pled guilty to one count of passing a U.S. Treasury check bearing a forged endorsement, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 510 (a)(2). On November 6, 1992, following her guilty plea, McKenzie was sentenced to a period of 60 months probation with supervision, and was required to comply with certain specified conditions and terms. On December 5, 1992, McKenzie's…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.