United States v. George Paul Salemo

996 F.2d 1229 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. George Paul SALEMO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10501. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1993. * Decided June 16, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 George Paul Salemo appeals the district court's denial of his motion for reconsideration of a clarification order entered against him. However, we do not have jurisdiction because the clarification order was not a final order and, in addition, was subsequently vacated. We dismiss. I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS BELOW 3 Salemo pleaded guilty to wire fraud and use of a false social security number, and was sentenced to 176 months. 1 The court entered two protective orders and a third clarification order, which is the subject of this appeal, in an attempt to keep Salemo from harassing his family members who were acting as government witnesses.…