United States v. Raymond Perez-Castillo

996 F.2d 1229 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond PEREZ-CASTILLO, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30159. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. June 16, 1993. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington, NO. CR-87-122-02-JET; Jack E. Tanner, District Judge, Presiding. Before: FARRIS, FERGUSON, AND D.W. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Raymond Perez-Castillo appeals his twenty-five-year sentence for distribution of cocaine and conspiracy to distribute cocaine under 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a) and 846. Perez argues that resentencing is required because the district court failed to comply with its obligation under Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D) to resolve or disavow reliance upon an asserted factual inaccuracy in the presentence report (PSR). See United States v. Fernandez-Angulo, 897 F.2d 1514, 1516 (9th Cir.1990) (en banc). We have jurisdiction under 28…