United States v. Antonio Navarro-Negrete

996 F.2d 1229 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Antonio NAVARRO-NEGRETE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10378. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 14, 1993. * Decided May 20, 1993. Before REINHARDT, TROTT and RYMER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Antonio Navarro-Negrete appeals his conviction for importation and possession with intent to distribute marijuana pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 952 (a) and 841(a)(1) (1988). The district court had jurisdiction over this case pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231 . We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . 3 * EXCLUDED EVIDENCE 4 Appellant argues that the district court's refusal to admit the testimony of an officer who searched the house appellant shared with his brother is reversible error. The officer searched appellant's home on December 13, 1991, almost three weeks after appellant was arrested for…