United States v. Mark A. Pelozzie

996 F.2d 1229 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Mark A. PELOZZIE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30072. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1993. * Decided June 17, 1993. MEMORANDUM ** Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 Mark A. Pelozzie appeals his conviction, following a jury trial, for being a felon in possession of a firearm in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 922 (g)(1). Pelozzie contends that the district court erred by (1) denying his pretrial motion to dismiss because the search warrant was not supported by probable cause and (2) denying his motion for judgment of acquittal because the evidence was insufficient to support his conviction. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and affirm. 2 * Probable Cause 3 We review for clear error a magistrate's determination of probable cause to issue a search warrant. United States v. Terry, 911 F.2d 272,…