United States v. Raymond Lester Worthy

996 F.2d 1229 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Raymond Lester WORTHY, Defendant-Appellant. No. 93-50007. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1993. * Decided July 2, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Raymond Lester Worthy appeals his 18-month sentence following entry of a guilty plea for dealing in explosive materials in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 842 (a)(1). Worthy contends that the district court erred by (1) denying a reduction in his offense level for acceptance of responsibility under U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 and (2) failing to resolve disputed factual matters in the presentence report ("PSR") in violation of Fed.R.Crim.P. 32(c)(3)(D). We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm in part and vacate and remand in part. 3 We review for clear error the district court's determination that Worthy did not accept…