United States v. Donise Warren

996 F.2d 1229 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Donise WARREN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-50714. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1993. * Decided June 17, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Donise Warren appeals her 18-month sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines following her guilty plea to production of counterfeit access devices in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1029 (a)(1). Warren contends that the district court erred by denying her a downward adjustment pursuant to U.S.S.G. § 3E1.1 for acceptance of responsibility, and that the government breached the plea agreement by failing to recommend a reduction for acceptance of responsibility. We have jurisdiction under 18 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 * Background 4 Warren was arrested on February 6, 1991, after a search of her apartment uncovered…