Lloyd Vickroy v. Rockwell International Corporation Richard C. Seamans David Shapiro Marc Kartman William R. Hartman, Jr. Gary Phelps

996 F.2d 1229 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Lloyd VICKROY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. ROCKWELL INTERNATIONAL CORPORATION; Richard C. Seamans; David Shapiro; Marc Kartman; William R. Hartman, Jr.; Gary Phelps, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-56469. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1993. * Decided June 18, 1993. Before CANBY, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Lloyd Vickroy appeals pro se the district court's summary judgment for Rockwell International Corp., his former employer, and various employees and agents of Rockwell. The district court found that Vickroy's claims were barred by the doctrine of res judicata. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 In this action, Vickroy contends that his fifth amendment due process rights were violated in a prior action brought by Vickroy against Rockwell because defendants lied under oath during those proceedings. In the prior action in…