United States v. Javier Toscano-Padilla

Good Law
996 F.2d 1229·1993 WL 210793·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 22294
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 16, 199392-30247California2,443 words

Opinion

Opinion

996 F.2d 1229 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier TOSCANO-PADILLA, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-30247. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 9, 1993. * Decided June 16, 1993. Before: BRUNETTI, LEAVY and TROTT, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Appellant Javier Toscano-Padilla appeals his conviction for conspiracy and aiding and abetting the distribution of cocaine, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846. Toscano alleges (1) the district court erred in refusing to suppress statements he made to the police while in custody; (2) the evidence was insufficient to sustain the convictions; (3) the government's conduct during the investigation violated his due process rights; and (4) he was denied effective assistance of counsel. 3 We determine the district court committed no errors, and thus we affirm. 4 * ADMISSION OF STATEMENTS 5 Toscano maintains the district court…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.