United States v. John Trefren

996 F.2d 1229 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. John TREFREN, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-37015. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 8, 1993. * Decided June 15, 1993. Before CANBY, FERNANDEZ and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM ** Federal prisoner John Trefren appeals pro se the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his sentence. Trefren pled guilty to drug offenses and was sentenced to serve 51 months in prison consecutive to his Idaho state sentence. Trefren contends that his guilty plea was invalid because he expected the district court to impose a concurrent sentence. He also argues that the district court erred by failing to extend the time for filing his direct appeal. We review de novo, United States v. Angelone, 894 F.2d 1129, 1130 (9th Cir.1990) and affirm. 1 On February 24, 1989, Trefren pled guilty pursuant to a plea agreement to…