Waldo E. Waldron-Ramsey v. Donald O. Manning, Fire Chief, Spokane County

Good Law
996 F.2d 1230·1993 WL 241566·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 22587
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 2, 199391-36182California862 words

Opinion

Opinion

996 F.2d 1230 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Waldo E. WALDRON-RAMSEY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Donald O. MANNING, Fire Chief, Spokane County, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-36182. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted June 21, 1993. * Decided July 2, 1993. Before: CANBY, FERNANDEZ, and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Waldo Waldron-Ramsey, a Washington state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's denial of his Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration of the district court's denial of his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review the district court's grant of summary judgment de novo, and the denial of the Rule 59(e) motion for an abuse of discretion, McCarthy v. Mayo, 827 F.2d 1310, 1314 (9th Cir.1987). We affirm. 3 Waldron-Ramsey contends that his right of meaningful access to the courts was violated when officials of the Spokane County Jail refused to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.