United States v. Ronald L. Lingenfelter, United States of America v. Gary Marolf, AKA Gary Marlow, United States of America v. Lawrence Morgan

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 8410·997 F.2d 632·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 15893·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4978
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 30, 199392-50348, 92-50359 and 92-50362California4,520 words

Opinion

Opinion

Wallace, J.

Lingenfelter, Marolf, and Morgan appeal from their judgments of conviction following conditional guilty pleas to conspiracy to import approximately 900 kilograms of marijuana in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 963 . Lingen-felter and Morgan also challenge their conditional plea convictions for conducting a financial transaction involving the proceeds of drug trafficking in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1956 (a)(1). Lingenfelter alone appeals his sentence under the United States Sentencing Guidelines (Guidelines). The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3231 . We have jurisdiction over this timely appeal pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 . We affirm.

I

On the morning of July 10,1991, an anonymous telephone caller told Agent Stevens of the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA) that Morgan was in possession of approximately two tons of marijuana, which was stored in a warehouse located at 1835 Whittier Avenue, unit C-6, in Costa Mesa, California (warehouse). The caller indicated that Morgan owned or operated a company entitled Royal Pacific Golf Association, which leased the warehouse. The caller gave Stevens directions to Morgan’s residence and stated that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.