Hilo v. Exxon Corporation

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 8404·997 F.2d 641·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 15894·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4969
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 30, 199392-56496California3,419 words

Opinion

Opinion

997 F.2d 641 William S. HILO; Mansour Azizian; Mehdi C. Ghassemi; Nabil Helo; Pastor Apeles; Hossain Meftagh, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. EXXON CORPORATION; Exxon Company, USA; Chevron Corporation; Chevron U.S.A. Products Company, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-56496. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Feb. 2, 1993. Decided June 30, 1993. Joseph M. Alioto, San Francisco, CA, for plaintiffs-appellants. Robert G. Abrams, Howrey & Simon, Washington, DC, and Robert P. Taylor, Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro, San Francisco, CA, for defendants-appellees. Dimitri G. Daskal, The Daskal Law Firm, Washington, DC, for amicus Service Station Dealers of America. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California. Before: HUG, FERGUSON, O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judge: 1 We must decide between competing accounts of what Congress intended for preliminary relief in suits alleging violations of the statute that governs franchise relationships in the petroleum marketing industry. 2 * Hilo and all other appellants ("Dealers") are service station dealers operating under franchise agreements with Exxon.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.