United States v. John Lunstedt

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 8661·997 F.2d 665·1993 WL 239996·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 16190·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5135
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 6, 199392-30246California1,730 words

Opinion

Opinion

Pregerson, J.

John Lunstedt appeals his conviction for possession of a firearm in a Federal court facility under 18 U.S.C. § 930 (d)(1). Lun-stedt contends that his conviction and ten-month sentence should be reversed because (1) the district court erred in denying his motion to dismiss the prosecution’s indictment; (2) there is insufficient evidence to support the jury’s verdict; and (3) the court gave the jury an inadequate instruction on an element of his offense. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and 18 U.S.C. § 3742 . We affirm.

BACKGROUND

On July 9, 1991, Lunstedt entered the Gus J. Solomon Federal Courthouse in Portland, Oregon. He walked through the front entrance, through a small foyer, through a second set of doors, and arrived at an x-ray machine. Lunstedt carried a small gym bag. He placed this bag on the conveyor belt of the x-ray machine. He then walked through a metal detector. At a security officer’s request, Lunstedt emptied his pockets, which contained a small pocket-knife. The security officer informed Lunstedt that he could not bring the knife into the courthouse. Lun-stedt put his name and phone number on a piece of paper and wrapped the knife in the paper. He…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.