United States v. Joaquin Garcia, Joaquin Garcia v. Margaret C. Hambrick, Warden, Metropolitan Detention Center Los Angeles

Caution
93 Daily Journal DAR 7299·997 F.2d 1273·1993 WL 194322·25 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 1454·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 13490
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 10, 199390-50316, 90-56082California5,902 words

Opinion

Opinion

Thompson, J.

In his direct appeal in United States v. Garcia, No. 90-50316, Joaquin Garcia appeals his convictions after a bench trial on five counts of possession with intent to distribute cocaine and heroin, 21 U.S.C. § 841 (a)(1); two counts of weapons possession, 26 U.S.C. §§ 5861 (i) and 5871 and 18 U.S.C. §§ 922 (o )(1) and 924(d); and one count of using a machine gun during and in relation to a drug trafficking crime, 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c)(1). Garcia contends the district court erred in determining that police officers did not violate the Fourth Amendment when, without a warrant, they walked up to the back door of his apartment, talked to the occupants for five minutes while pretending to be apartment hunters, looked through a dark screen door and saw Garcia holding cocaine, and then gained entry and arrested him inside. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

In Garcia v. Hambrick, No. 90-56082, the government appeals from the district court’s judgment granting Garcia’s petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 to vacate his conviction for violating 18 U.S.C. § 924 (c), one of the counts of which he was convicted in his bench trial. The district court vacated the section 924(c)…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.