United States v. Dennis Santander Simoy

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 9048·998 F.2d 751·1993 WL 257418·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 17389·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5339
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 14, 199392-10527California1,549 words

Opinion

Opinion

Goodwin, J.

Simoy appeals his conviction for felony murder, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1111 , and robbery, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2111 . Appellant contends that the district court erred in .finding that a witness’s identification of appellant was reliable, and therefore admissible at trial, despite an unnecessarily suggestive identification procedure. In addition, he claims that the district court abused its discretion in denying his request for a jury instruction covering the lesser included offense of second degree murder. We affirm.

Reliability of Davis’s Identification

At approximately 8:00 p.m. on December 29, 1991, Sergeant Stacey Levay escorted Peregrina Armour, an Andersen Air Force Basé clerk, to the Bank of Fort Sam Houston for the purpose of depositing the commissary’s daily proceeds. Following the usual procedure, Armour drove her own car and Levay followed in his patrol vehicle. The parking lot was lit by street lights. The breezeway which screened the side of the bank building, however, was unlit.

As Armour and Levay stepped into the breezeway entrance, they were attacked by two men who stole the money pouch containing the daily proceeds. During the attack, Levay was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.