United States v. David Arias-Villanueva, United States of America v. Carlos Humberto Orantes-Arriaga, United States of America v. Adolfo Plancarte-Raya

Good Law
93 Daily Journal DAR 9291·998 F.2d 1491·39 Fed. R. Serv. 320·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 18012·93 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5481
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 20, 199392-30280California10,348 words

Opinion

Opinion

998 F.2d 1491 39 Fed. R. Evid. Serv. 320 UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David ARIAS-VILLANUEVA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Carlos Humberto ORANTES-ARRIAGA, Defendant-Appellant. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Adolfo PLANCARTE-RAYA, Defendant-Appellant. Nos. 91-30393, 91-30403 and 92-30280. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted March 1, 1993. Decided July 20, 1993. Mark Bennett Weintraub, Weintraub & Halley, Phillip M. Margolin, Margolin & Margolin, Philip A. Lewis, Portland, OR, for defendants-appellants. Johnathan S. Haub, Asst. U.S. Atty., Portland, OR, for plaintiff-appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Oregon. Before: TANG, POOLE, and RYMER, Circuit Judges. POOLE, Circuit Judge: 1 Appellants David Arias-Villanueva, Carlos Humberto Orantes-Arriaga and Adolfo Plancarte-Raya appeal their convictions and sentences for conspiracy to possess with the intent to distribute heroin, in violation of 21 U.S.C. §§ 841 (a)(1) and 846, and related charges. We find that their arguments on appeal afford them no relief and therefore…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.