Edwin Cordon-Resenos v. Immigration and Naturalization Service

Good Law
999 F.2d 542·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 25503
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 21, 199392-70033California581 words

Opinion

Opinion

999 F.2d 542 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Edwin CORDON-RESENOS, Petitioner, v. IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, Respondent. No. 92-70033. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 15, 1993. * Decided July 21, 1993. 1 Before: WOOD ** , REINHARDT, and RYMER, Circuit Judges 2 MEMORANDUM *** 3 Edwin Cordon-Resenos, a native and citizen of Guatemala, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals's (BIA) summary dismissal of his appeal of the Immigration Judge's (IJ) deportation order. The IJ determined that Cordon-Resenos was statutorily ineligible for voluntary departure because of his admissions that he had entered the country without inspection in February 1984, and that he had been convicted in March 1990 of the sale or transportation of marijuana. After an independent review of the evidence of record, transcripts, and briefings, the BIA concluded that Cordon-Resenos's appeal was frivolous and summarily dismissed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.