Robert D. Freeman v. State of Idaho Commission of Pardons & Paroles

999 F.2d 542 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Robert D. FREEMAN, Petitioner-Appellant, v. STATE OF IDAHO COMMISSION OF PARDONS & PAROLES, Respondent-Appellee. No. 92-36548. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 14, 1993. * Decided July 27, 1993. As Corrected on Denial of Rehearing Nov. 22, 1993. Before CANBY, WIGGINS and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Robert Freeman, an Idaho prisoner, appeals from the district court's judgment denying his habeas petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 . Freeman raises procedural due process and ex post facto objections to the state's refusal to grant him parole. We review de novo, Thomas v. Brewer, 923 F.2d 1361, 1364 (9th Cir.1991), and we affirm. BACKGROUND 3 Freeman pleaded guilty in 1982 to two counts of lewd and lascivious conduct with a minor, in violation of Idaho Code Section 18-6607. He received consecutive sentences of 20 and 10 years on those counts, subject to that…