Antonio Duenas and Vivian Duenas v. Yama's Co., Inc. And Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance Company, Ltd., Antonio Duenas and Vivian Duenas v. Department of Public Works, Government of Guam, Antonio Duenas and Vivian Duenas v. Maeda Pacific Corp.

Good Law
999 F.2d 542·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26120
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 26, 199392-15885California3,305 words

Opinion

Opinion

999 F.2d 542 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Antonio DUENAS and Vivian Duenas, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. YAMA'S CO., INC. and Tokio Marine & Fire Insurance Company, Ltd., Defendants-Appellees. Antonio DUENAS and Vivian Duenas, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WORKS, Government of Guam, Defendants-Appellees. Antonio DUENAS and Vivian Duenas, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. MAEDA PACIFIC CORP., et al., Defendants-Appellees. Nos. 91-16923, 92-15885 and 92-15919. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 16, 1993. Decided July 26, 1993. Before FAIRCHILD, * BEEZER and WIGGINS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** I. OVERVIEW 2 Antonio Duenas was involved in an automobile accident with a tour bus owned by Yama's Co., Inc. He and his wife brought suit against Yama's and its liability insurance carrier, Tokio Marine and Fire Insurance Co., Ltd. The Duenases also brought a related suit against the Department of Public Works, the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.