John L. Corrigan v. Peter K. Steere George Shields
Opinion
Opinion
999 F.2d 542 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John L. CORRIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Peter K. STEERE; George Shields, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36957. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 6, 1993. * Decided July 13, 1993. Before TANG, POOLE and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John L. Corrigan appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing his civil rights complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d) and striking as moot his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for abuse of discretion. Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 1734 (1992). We affirm. 3 Corrigan filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , seeking review and reversal of decisions of the Washington state trial and appellate courts. He sought injunctive relief alleging that the state courts were denying him "due process of law." The district court dismissed the…