John L. Corrigan v. Peter K. Steere George Shields

Good Law
999 F.2d 542·1993 WL 263461·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 25495
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 13, 199392-36957California505 words

Opinion

Opinion

999 F.2d 542 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John L. CORRIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Peter K. STEERE; George Shields, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-36957. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 6, 1993. * Decided July 13, 1993. Before TANG, POOLE and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 John L. Corrigan appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing his civil rights complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915 (d) and striking as moot his motion for a preliminary injunction. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review for abuse of discretion. Denton v. Hernandez, 112 S.Ct. 1728, 1734 (1992). We affirm. 3 Corrigan filed a civil rights complaint pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 , seeking review and reversal of decisions of the Washington state trial and appellate courts. He sought injunctive relief alleging that the state courts were denying him "due process of law." The district court dismissed the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.