Richard W. Freedle v. Campbell Soup Co.

999 F.2d 542 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Richard W. FREEDLE, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. CAMPBELL SOUP CO., Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-15331. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 12, 1993. * Decided July 22, 1993. Before: WALLACE, Chief Judge, and D.W. NELSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Richard W. Freedle ("Freedle") brought suit against Campbell Soup Company ("Campbell") in California state court asserting various causes of action arising from the termination of his employment as a payroll manager. Campbell removed the case to federal court on the basis of diversity. The district court granted Campbell's motion for summary judgment on Freedle's claims for wrongful termination, breach of contract, and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing. 1 Freedle appealed pro se. We affirm. 3 A grant of summary judgment is reviewed de novo. Schneider v. TRW, Inc., 938 F.2d 986, 989 (9th Cir.1991).…