Benjamin v. Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, & Firearms

Good Law
999 F.2d 542·1993 WL 280397·1993 U.S. App. LEXIS 26119
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJuly 26, 199391-36069California504 words

Opinion

Opinion

999 F.2d 542 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. John C. BENJAMIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. BUREAU OF ALCOHOL, TOBACCO, & FIREARMS: Charles H. Turner, U.S. Attorney; Nicholas F. Baily; Richard Thornburgh, U.S. Attorney General, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-36069. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted July 14, 1993. Decided July 26, 1993. 1 Before FARRIS and THOMPSON, Circuit Judges, and HARDY, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 The district court upheld the decision of the BATF to revoke Benjamin's license to manufacture machine guns. The court found that on July 7, 1993, Benjamin willfully refused to allow inspectors from the BATF to have access to his premises, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 923 (g)(1)(B)(ii) and 27 C.F.R. § 178.23 (b)(2). We review the district court's finding of fact for clear error. Securities & Exchange Comm'n v. American Principals Holding, Inc., 962 F.2d 1402 , 1405 (9th Cir.1992). 4 Benjamin…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.