Mary E. Grigsby v. Universal Foods Corporation Does I Through X

999 F.2d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Mary E. GRIGSBY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. UNIVERSAL FOODS CORPORATION; Does I Through X, Defendants-Appellees. No. 91-55864. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted Oct. 6, 1992. Decided July 2, 1993. 1 Before O'SCANNLAIN and RYMER, Circuit Judges, and ZILLY, * District Judge. 2 MEMORANDUM ** 3 Grigsby appeals from the district court's grant of summary judgment in favor of Universal Foods ("Universal") on her breach of employment contract, breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing, and pregnancy discrimination claims. We affirm the grant of summary judgment on the pregnancy discrimination claim, and reverse on the breach of contract and breach of the implied covenant of good faith and fair dealing claims. 4 The appellant Mary Grigsby was employed by the appellee Universal Foods under a written employment contract for a five-year term. Grigsby claims that prior to the…