Abdullah Muhammad v. Jim Rowland

999 F.2d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Abdullah MUHAMMAD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Jim ROWLAND, Defendant-Appellee. No. 92-16023. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 15, 1993. * Decided July 23, 1993. Before WALLACE, Chief Judge, and D.W. NELSON and O'SCANNLAIN, Circuit Judges. MEMORANDUM 1 Muhammad, a California state prisoner, appeals from the district court's dismissal (which we interpret as a dismissal of the action as to certain defendants) and summary judgment in favor of certain defendants in Muhammad's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 action alleging various violations of his constitutional rights. The district court had jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . Our jurisdiction over this timely appeal is founded on 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We affirm. 2 We review the summary judgment de novo. T.W. Elec. Serv., Inc. v. Pacific Elec. Contractors Ass'n, 809 F.2d 626 , 629 (9th Cir.1987). We must determine, viewing the evidence in…