Paul Henry Jones v. James Gomez, Director Attorney General of the State of California
Opinion
Opinion
999 F.2d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Paul Henry JONES, Petitioner-Appellant, v. James GOMEZ, Director; Attorney General of the State of California, Respondents-Appellees. No. 92-56331. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 6, 1993. * Decided July 14, 1993. Before TANG, POOLE and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Paul Henry Jones, a California state prisoner, appeals pro se the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for habeas corpus. We dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. 1 3 The district court entered judgment dismissing the petition on April 27, 1992. On May 3, 1992, Jones served a motion for reconsideration. On May 18, 1992, Jones filed his notice of appeal. The district court denied Jones's motion for reconsideration on May 21, 1992. 4 We construe Jones's motion for reconsideration as a motion pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 59(e). See United States v. Nutricology Inc., 982 F.2d 394,…