In Re Daniel R. Lawson Bettye J. Lawson, Debtors. Daniel R. Lawson Bettye J. Lawson v. Law Offices of David A. Tilem, in Re Daniel R. Lawson Bettye J. Lawson, Debtors. Daniel R. Lawson Bettye J. Lawson v. Law Offices of David A. Tilem

999 F.2d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. In re Daniel R. LAWSON; Bettye J. Lawson, Debtors. Daniel R. LAWSON; Bettye J. Lawson, Appellants, v. LAW OFFICES OF DAVID A. TILEM, Appellee. In re Daniel R. Lawson; Bettye J. Lawson, Debtors. Daniel R. LAWSON; Bettye J. Lawson, Appellants, v. LAW OFFICES OF DAVID A. TILEM, Appellee. Nos. 90-55563, 91-55622. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted May 5, 1993. * Decided July 13, 1993. Before KOZINSKI, SUHRHEINRICH ** and T.G. NELSON, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM *** 2 In this consolidated appeal, the Lawsons challenge an order of the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel (BAP) dismissing their appeal for failure to prosecute (BAP No. CC-89-1052; No. 91-55622); and a BAP order affirming the bankruptcy court's order directing payment of attorney Tilem's administrative claim (BAP No. CC-89-1394; No. 90-55563). The BAP had jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 158 (b). We have jurisdiction over this timely…