Murray Lee Martin v. Gary D. MacOmber

999 F.2d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Murray Lee MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary D. MACOMBER, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15557. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 6, 1993 * Decided July 9, 1993. Before TANG, POOLE and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Murray L. Martin appeals pro se the district court's order adopting the magistrate-judge's report and recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice based on appellant's failure to file a timely status report. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we review for an abuse of discretion. See Hernandez v. Whiting, 881 F.2d 768, 770 (9th Cir.1989). We affirm. 3 Martin contends that the district court erred in dismissing this action as a sanction for failure to file a status report. Pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 41(b), the district court may dismiss an action for failure to comply with any order of the court. Eldridge v. Block, 832…