Curtis Howard v. Frank Roesch David Bigeleisen California State Bar Lucy Kelly McCabe Judge S.F. Superior Court Jerry Hauser Susan C. Seiler

999 F.2d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Curtis HOWARD, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Frank ROESCH; David Bigeleisen; California State Bar; Lucy Kelly McCabe, Judge; S.F. Superior Court; Jerry Hauser; Susan C. Seiler, Defendants-Appellees. No. 93-15281. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 6, 1993. * Decided July 13, 1993. Before TANG, POOLE and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 Curtis Howard appeals pro se the district court's order dismissing his action. In its order, the district court abstained from exercising jurisdiction over Howard's federal law claims and declined to exercise pendent jurisdiction over Howard's state law claims. The district court alternatively held that Howard failed to state a claim for relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 . Howard also appeals the district court's denial of his motion for leave to amend his complaint. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 . We review de novo the…