Marin Audubon Society v. William Seidman, Director, Fdic Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation James Bledsoe

999 F.2d 543 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. MARIN AUDUBON SOCIETY, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. William SEIDMAN, Director, FDIC; Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation; James Bledsoe, Defendants-Appellees. No. 92-15003. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 18, 1993. Decided July 13, 1993. Before: LAY, * HUG, and SCHROEDER, Circuit Judges. 1 MEMORANDUM ** 2 The issue in this case is whether the FDIC violated Section 7 of the Endangered Species Act ("ESA"), 16 U.S.C. § 1536 , when it sold a security interest in real property without consulting the Fish and Wildlife Service ("FWS"). The district court granted the FDIC's motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 3 On July 2, 1991, Marin Audubon Society ("Marin") filed a complaint in federal district court to challenge FDIC's failure to consult with FWS prior to the sale of a security interest in…