United States v. Amanda Bandera-Salas

999 F.2d 544 NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Amanda BANDERA-SALAS, Defendant-Appellant. No. 92-10697. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Submitted July 6, 1993. * Decided July 13, 1993. MEMORANDUM ** Before TANG, POOLE and NORRIS, Circuit Judges. 1 Amanda Bandera-Salas appeals her jury conviction for three counts of trafficking in false immigration documents in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1546 (a) and three counts of transferring false identification documents in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1028 (a)(2). Bandera-Salas contends that the district court erred by refusing her request for an entrapment instruction and by improperly admitting into evidence a Social Security Administration computer printout. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 , and we affirm. 2 * Entrapment Instruction 3 The standard of review for a district court's refusal to give a requested jury instruction is subject…